When the Westminster Assembly first gathered in 1643, England was a nation in turmoil. Civil war had torn apart Parliament, the monarchy, and the church. Bishops were removed, parishes were fractured, and the familiar rhythms of worship were shaken. Into this unsettled world came more than a hundred divines, called by Parliament to articulate a confession of faith that might steady a weary and divided nation.
The Scots soon joined them, sent by their General Assembly to ensure that any English settlement was faithful to the shared Reformed tradition of the two kingdoms. Together, they worked through harsh winters while armies clashed and families mourned losses on every side. The Westminster Confession of Faith was forged not in peace but in urgency, and it bears the marks of a church striving to find certainty in a world of upheaval.
Faith under Fire
The divines who gathered in Westminster Abbey were not abstract scholars. They were pastors, preachers, and teachers carrying the weight of a suffering people into every debate. Their work was intended to shape the faith of ordinary congregations, not only the learned. And in this climate, they turned early to one of the most contested and emotionally charged doctrines of the Christian tradition: the eternal decrees of God.
Predestination, election, and the mystery of God’s purposes had stirred theological debate for centuries. But for the Westminster divines, these doctrines were not speculative ideas. They were pastoral truths intended to anchor believers in a world that seemed to be unravelling.
Certainty in a Shaken World
Chapter Three of the Confession, Of God’s Eternal Decree, expresses a classic Calvinist conviction. God ordains all things that come to pass. God elects some to eternal life. Others, the text says, God “passes by”, ordaining them to dishonour and wrath. The purpose, the divines insisted, was not to promote fear but assurance. Salvation rests not on human frailty but on divine faithfulness.
This is the theology inherited from Calvin and shaped by the Reformed tradition of the sixteenth century. The Westminster divines did not try to explain predestination in philosophical terms. They read Romans 9 and Ephesians 1 as plain declarations of God’s sovereign mercy, and they believed these truths would give weary believers the confidence that their salvation was secure.
Yet for many readers today, this remains difficult. Reprobation sits uneasily with our understanding of God’s goodness. And so, when reading the Confession, it is unsurprising that many Christians pause at this point and begin to wrestle. I find myself among them.
Wrestling with Timelessness and Grace
As I sit with Westminster’s strong language, I am drawn to older and broader Christian reflections on the nature of God. Long before the Reformed tradition, thinkers such as Boethius and Aquinas described God as timeless, holding all history in a single act of knowing. Later writers, including C. S. Lewis, adopted this same understanding. A timeless God does not look down a corridor of future events but sees all moments at once.
Karl Barth later offered a very different way of thinking about election. He argued that God’s choice is first and foremost the choice of Jesus Christ. In Christ, God chooses all humanity for grace, because Christ holds both sides of the mystery as the God who elects and the human who is elected. This avoids both the idea that everyone is saved without question and the idea that God rejects most people. Instead, it presents a Christ-centred vision in which God’s eternal decision is grounded in mercy.
Drawing on this wider Christian tradition, the mystery of predestination begins to look different. It becomes less a matter of God dividing souls into categories before they exist, and more a picture of God eternally knowing and loving His creatures in the fullness of their story. God’s eternal life embraces all moments of our temporal lives. What looks like decision in time is, in eternity, God’s unchanging love. And for myself, I hold to the hope that God would not turn anyone away, for salvation is offered to all.
This does not erase the stark language of Westminster, and it does not override the historical convictions of the divines. But it opens a way for modern readers to hold sovereignty and compassion together, without losing either.
Bread and Wine in a Divided Kingdom
The same pastoral concern appears in the Confession’s chapter on the Lord’s Supper. In the years leading up to the Assembly, worship had been shaped by ceremonial changes that many felt obscured the heart of the sacrament. The divines responded by simplifying the practice and grounding it firmly in Scripture.
The Supper, they wrote, is a memorial and a seal of communion with Christ. The bread remains bread, the wine remains wine, yet by the Spirit believers truly feed on Christ. It is a meeting place of grace, not a battleground of theological suspicion.
In a nation torn by conflict, the Assembly sought to make the Lord’s Table a place of nourishment and unity, not division.
The Pastoral Soul of Westminster
From a distance, the Westminster Confession can appear stern, structured, and unyielding. But read closely, it reveals a pastoral heart shaped by suffering and hope. Its authors believed that doctrine could steady the soul, and that assurance was found not in the shifting tides of human effort but in the constancy of God.
Yet they also invite us, centuries later, to continue the work of wrestling. To read deeply. To question faithfully. To bring our troubled thoughts into the presence of God.
And perhaps this, too, is a form of pastoral legacy: a confession that asks not for unthinking acceptance but for honest engagement, rooted in the conviction that God’s mercy is wider than we can fathom.
“The eternal God is thy refuge, and underneath are the everlasting arms.”
Deuteronomy 33:27
You can follow more reflections and moments of faith and beauty on Instagram @thechristianwoman.co.uk or subscribe to my newsletter here.
Comments